|
x264 High Definition Encoding Benchmark Ich bin vorhin mal wieder über einen Benchmark gestolpert, mit dem die Encoding-Effizienz von CPUs und deren Leistung gemessen werden kann. Das ganze unterstützt Multi-CPU Systeme und ist recht einfach zu handhaben: [LIST=1][*][URL="http://www.techarp.com/showarticle.aspx?artno=520#download"]Hier[/URL] runterladen[*]Archiv in einen Ordner entpacken.[*]x264_benchmark-720p.bat starten (das benötigte AviSynth wird automatisch heruntergeladen, wenn noch nicht installiert).[*]Warten (System nicht anderweitig nutzen, da das die Ergebnisse verfälschen könnte).[*]Zum Schluss aus der 720p_results-test.txt den [B]jeweils besten Wert von PASS1 und PASS2[/B] hier veröffentlichen.[/LIST]Weiterhin bitte [B]verwendete CPU, ggf. Übertaktung und Betriebssystem angeben[/B]. Wichtig: Sollte die Batch AviSynth nicht finden, obwohl es installiert ist, dann bearbeitet die batch und ersetzt %programfiles% durch den Dateipfad, in den ihr AviSynth installiert habt (Danke an redfalcon, der das gelöst hat). [code]:avisynth_check32 if exist "[COLOR=red]%PROGRAMFILES%[/COLOR]/AviSynth 2.5" goto start :avisynth_check64 if exist "[COLOR=red]%PROGRAMFILES(x86)%[/COLOR]/AviSynth 2.5" goto start[/code]--------- [U][B]UPDATE:[/B][/U] Der Benchmark liegt inzwischen in einer neuen Version vor [quote]This release automatically inserts the relevant hardware details into the results.rtf file as well as gives users the option to run version 0.59.819 of x264.exe which is 10-15 % faster than the original![/quote]Bitte unterscheidet also beim Posten eurer Ergebnisse zwischen den Versionen, so dass dies kenntlich gemacht werden kann. [CENTER]----------------------------------------------------------------------------- [SIZE=4][U][B]Ergebnisse:[/B][/U][/SIZE][/CENTER] [SIZE=4][B][U] QuadCores [/U][/B][/SIZE][SIZE=3][B]91,78 / 34.57[/B] - Intel Core i7 860 2,8 GHz - Win 7 64 - [SIZE=3][URL="http://www.tweakpc.de/forum/648327-post29.html"]Exit[/URL][/SIZE] (v0.59)[/SIZE] [B][SIZE=3]75.64 / 22.80[/SIZE][/B][SIZE=3] - Intel Core 2 Quad Q9450 3,5 GHz - XP ?? - [URL="http://www.tweakpc.de/forum/620404-post25.html"]RoE187[/URL] (v0.59) [/SIZE][B][SIZE=3]72,27 / 20,15[/SIZE][/B][SIZE=3] - Intel Core 2 Quad Q6600 3,6 GHz - Win7 RC 64 - [URL="http://www.tweakpc.de/forum/620436-post26.html"]Bad Blade[/URL] (v0.59)[/SIZE] [SIZE=4][B][SIZE=3]64.96 / 15.97[/SIZE][/B][SIZE=3] - AMD Phenom X4 9850 3,0 GHz - Vista 32 - [URL="http://www.tweakpc.de/forum/545870-post15.html"]dr_Cox[/URL] [B]58.36 / 16.11[/B] - Intel Core 2 Duo Q6600 2,88 GHz - XP 32 - [URL="http://www.tweakpc.de/forum/548047-post18.html"]Death_Angel[/URL] [/SIZE][B] [U] DualCores [/U][/B][/SIZE] [SIZE=3][B]45.76 / 11.98[/B] - Intel Core 2 Duo E8400 4,05 GHz - XP 64 - [URL="http://www.tweakpc.de/forum/546870-post17.html"]Fr@ddy[/URL][/SIZE] [SIZE=3][B]44.91 / 11.56[/B] - Intel Core 2 Duo E8400 3,83 GHz - XP 32 - [URL="http://www.tweakpc.de/forum/545217-post10.html"]Fr@ddy[/URL][/SIZE] [LEFT][SIZE=3][B]41.18 / 10.67[/B] - Intel Core 2 Duo E8400 3,6 GHz - XP 32 - [URL="http://www.tweakpc.de/forum/545078-post3.html"]borsti[/URL] [/SIZE][SIZE=3][B]39.55 / 10.05[/B] - Intel Core 2 Duo E6750 3,2 GHz Win7 RC 64[/SIZE] - [URL="http://www.tweakpc.de/forum/620398-post22.html"][SIZE=3]DiceMaster[/SIZE][/URL][SIZE=3] (v0.59)[/SIZE] [SIZE=3] [B] 38.14 / 9.68[/B] - [/SIZE][SIZE=3]Intel Core 2 Duo E6700 3,42 GHz - XP 32 - [URL="http://www.tweakpc.de/forum/545237-post14.html"]Exit[/URL][/SIZE] [SIZE=3] [B]37.18 / 9.41[/B] - Intel Core 2 Duo E6700 3,33 GHz - XP 32 - [URL="http://www.tweakpc.de/forum/545220-post12.html"]Exit[/URL] [B]36.19 / 9.05[/B] - Intel Core 2 Duo E6750 3,2 GHz - XP 32 - [URL="http://www.tweakpc.de/forum/545215-post9.html"]RoE187[/URL] [B]35.53 / 9.02[/B] - Intel Core 2 Duo E6750 3,2 GHz - Vista 32 - [URL="http://www.tweakpc.de/forum/545219-post11.html"]DiceMaster[/URL] [B]34.05 / 7.79[/B] - AMD Athlon X2 3800+ 3,2 GHz - Vista 32 - [URL="http://www.tweakpc.de/forum/545164-post8.html"]dr_Cox[/URL] [B]30.53 / 7.08 [/B]- AMD Athlon X2 4800+ 3,00 GHz - XP 32 - [URL="http://www.tweakpc.de/forum/545161-post7.html"]redfalcon[/URL] [B]27.69 / 6.39[/B] - AMD Athlon X2 4800+ 2,64 GHz - XP 32 - [URL="http://www.tweakpc.de/forum/545125-post6.html"][EID]-Mr.GiZMO[/URL] [/SIZE] [/LEFT] [SIZE=3][B]27.30 / 6.41[/B] - AMD Athlon X2 3800+ 2,75 GHz - Vista 32 - [URL="http://www.tweakpc.de/forum/545071-post2.html"]dr_Cox[/URL] [/SIZE] [LEFT][SIZE=3][B]27.15 / 6.33[/B] - AMD Athlon X2 3800+ 2,67 GHz - XP 32 - [URL="http://www.tweakpc.de/forum/545104-post4.html"]Stöhnie[/URL] [B]20.21 / 5.07[/B] - Intel Core 2 Duo M T7100 1,8 GHz - Vista 32 - [URL="http://www.tweakpc.de/forum/545121-post5.html"]-Alex-[/URL] [B] 19.08 / 5.02[/B] - Intel T5600 1,83 GHz - Vista 32 - [URL="http://www.tweakpc.de/forum/545236-post13.html"]peak-of-tweak[/URL] [U][B][SIZE=4]SingleCores[/SIZE][/B][/U] [B]10.52 / 2.46[/B] - Intel Pentium 4 HT 3,2 GHz - XP32 - [URL="http://www.tweakpc.de/forum/545121-post5.html"]-Alex-[/URL][/SIZE] [/LEFT] |
AW: x264 High Definition Encoding Benchmark ---------- RUN4PASS1.LOG encoded 1442 frames, 27.30 fps, 3905.08 kb/s ---------- RUN4PASS2.LOG encoded 1442 frames, 6.41 fps, 3942.92 kb/s AMD Athlon 64 X2 3800+, 2,75 GHz, Windows Vista 32 |
AW: x264 High Definition Encoding Benchmark [quote=bosti;] ---------- RUN1PASS1.LOG encoded 1442 frames, 40.41 fps, 3905.08 kb/s ---------- RUN2[B]PASS1[/B].LOG encoded 1442 frames, [SIZE=3][U][B]41.18[/B][/U][/SIZE] fps, 3905.08 kb/s ---------- RUN3PASS1.LOG encoded 1442 frames, 41.11 fps, 3905.08 kb/s ---------- RUN4PASS1.LOG encoded 1442 frames, 41.18 fps, 3905.08 kb/s ---------- RUN1[B]PASS2.[/B]LOG encoded 1442 frames, [SIZE=3][B]10.67 fps,[/B][/SIZE] 3942.92 kb/s ---------- RUN2PASS2.LOG encoded 1442 frames, 10.67 fps, 3942.92 kb/s ---------- RUN3PASS2.LOG encoded 1442 frames, 10.67 fps, 3942.92 kb/s ---------- RUN4PASS2.LOG encoded 1442 frames, 10.66 fps, 3942.92 kb/s[/quote] E8400 9x400; 4 4-4-12; 1,16V :nerd::nerd: OS XP 32bit |
AW: x264 High Definition Encoding Benchmark [code] ---------- RUN1PASS1.LOG encoded 1442 frames, 27.01 fps, 3905.08 kb/s ---------- RUN2PASS1.LOG encoded 1442 frames, 27.15 fps, 3905.08 kb/s ---------- RUN3PASS1.LOG encoded 1442 frames, 26.96 fps, 3905.08 kb/s ---------- RUN4PASS1.LOG encoded 1442 frames, 26.92 fps, 3905.08 kb/s ---------- RUN1PASS2.LOG encoded 1442 frames, 6.33 fps, 3942.92 kb/s ---------- RUN2PASS2.LOG encoded 1442 frames, 6.33 fps, 3942.92 kb/s ---------- RUN3PASS2.LOG encoded 1442 frames, 6.32 fps, 3942.92 kb/s ---------- RUN4PASS2.LOG encoded 1442 frames, 6.31 fps, 3942.92 kb/s [/code] S.939 A64 X2 3800+ (Toledo) 2x512kb Cache @2668MHz (10x266), Win XP Home :iosys: |
AW: x264 High Definition Encoding Benchmark [code] ---------- RUN1PASS1.LOG encoded 1442 frames, 10.51 fps, 3905.08 kb/s ---------- RUN2PASS1.LOG encoded 1442 frames, 10.48 fps, 3905.08 kb/s ---------- RUN3PASS1.LOG encoded 1442 frames, 10.52 fps, 3905.08 kb/s ---------- RUN4PASS1.LOG encoded 1442 frames, 10.49 fps, 3905.08 kb/s ---------- RUN1PASS2.LOG encoded 1442 frames, 2.45 fps, 3942.92 kb/s ---------- RUN2PASS2.LOG encoded 1442 frames, 2.46 fps, 3942.92 kb/s ---------- RUN3PASS2.LOG encoded 1442 frames, 2.45 fps, 3942.92 kb/s ---------- RUN4PASS2.LOG encoded 1442 frames, 2.46 fps, 3942.92 kb/s [/code]Intel Pentium 4 HT 3,2GHz (Sockel 478, Northwood, SL6WG) / Windows XP Professional 32-Bit [B]10.52 / 2.46[/B] - Intel Pentium 4 HT 3,2GHz - XP32 - [URL="http://www.tweakpc.de/forum/545121-post5.html"]-Alex-[/URL] [code] ---------- RUN1PASS1.LOG encoded 1442 frames, 20.13 fps, 3905.08 kb/s ---------- RUN2PASS1.LOG encoded 1442 frames, 20.09 fps, 3905.08 kb/s ---------- RUN3PASS1.LOG encoded 1442 frames, 20.16 fps, 3905.08 kb/s ---------- RUN4PASS1.LOG encoded 1442 frames, 20.21 fps, 3905.08 kb/s ---------- RUN1PASS2.LOG encoded 1442 frames, 5.06 fps, 3942.92 kb/s ---------- RUN2PASS2.LOG encoded 1442 frames, 5.05 fps, 3942.92 kb/s ---------- RUN3PASS2.LOG encoded 1442 frames, 5.07 fps, 3942.92 kb/s ---------- RUN4PASS2.LOG encoded 1442 frames, 5.07 fps, 3942.92 kb/s [/code]Intel Core 2 Duo Mobile T7100 1,8GHz (Sockel P, Merom, SLA4A) / Windows Vista Home Premium 32-Bit [B]20.21 / 5.07[/B] - Intel Core 2 Duo Mobile T7100 1,8GHz - Vista32 - [URL="http://www.tweakpc.de/forum/545121-post5.html"]-Alex-[/URL] Alex |
AW: x264 High Definition Encoding Benchmark [B]27.69 / 6.39[/B] - So. 939 AMD Athlon X2 4800+ 2,64 GHz - XP 32 - [EID]-Mr.GiZMO ---------- RUN1PASS1.LOG encoded 1442 frames, 27.69 fps, 3905.08 kb/s ---------- RUN1PASS2.LOG encoded 1442 frames, 6.39 fps, 3942.92 kb/s |
AW: x264 High Definition Encoding Benchmark [B]30.53/7.08[/B] Athlon64 X2 4800+ @ 3GHz, XP32 ---------- RUN3PASS1.LOG encoded 1442 frames, 30.53 fps, 3905.08 kb/s ---------- RUN3PASS2.LOG encoded 1442 frames, 7.08 fps, 3942.92 kb/s |
AW: x264 High Definition Encoding Benchmark ---------- RUN1PASS1.LOG encoded 1442 frames, 34.05 fps, 3905.08 kb/s ---------- RUN1PASS2.LOG encoded 1442 frames, 7.79 fps, 3942.92 kb/s Athlon X2 3800+ @3,2 GHz, Vista 32 |
AW: x264 High Definition Encoding Benchmark c2d e 6750 2,66@3,2ghz |xp pro 32bit ---------- RUN1PASS1.LOG encoded 1442 frames, 36.19 fps, 3905.08 kb/s ---------- RUN1PASS2.LOG encoded 1442 frames, 9.05 fps, 3942.92 kb/s mfg RoE187 |
AW: x264 High Definition Encoding Benchmark Bei mir wird die results-Datei nicht angelegt, kopiere einfach mal die Ausgabe von dem Programm hier rein. ............................................... Now Starting Run 1: Pass 1 of 2 avis [info]: 1280x720 @ 23.98 fps (1442 frames) encoded frames: 1442/1442 (100.0%), 44.86 fps, eta 0:00:00 encoded 1442 frames, 44.76 fps, 3905.08 kb/s ............................................... Now Starting Run 1: Pass 2 of 2 avis [info]: 1280x720 @ 23.98 fps (1442 frames) mp4 [info]: initial delay 1001 (scale 24000) 00 encoded 1442 frames, 11.55 fps, 3942.92 kb/s ............................................... Now Starting Run 2: Pass 1 of 2 avis [info]: 1280x720 @ 23.98 fps (1442 frames) encoded frames: 1442/1442 (100.0%), 44.97 fps, eta 0:00:00 encoded 1442 frames, 44.86 fps, 3905.08 kb/s ............................................... Now Starting Run 2: Pass 2 of 2 avis [info]: 1280x720 @ 23.98 fps (1442 frames) mp4 [info]: initial delay 1001 (scale 24000) 00 encoded 1442 frames, 11.56 fps, 3942.92 kb/s ............................................... Now Starting Run 3: Pass 1 of 2 avis [info]: 1280x720 @ 23.98 fps (1442 frames) encoded frames: 1442/1442 (100.0%), 44.98 fps, eta 0:00:00 encoded 1442 frames, 44.86 fps, 3905.08 kb/s ............................................... Now Starting Run 3: Pass 2 of 2 avis [info]: 1280x720 @ 23.98 fps (1442 frames) mp4 [info]: initial delay 1001 (scale 24000) 00 encoded 1442 frames, 11.55 fps, 3942.92 kb/s ............................................... Now Starting Run 4: Pass 1 of 2 avis [info]: 1280x720 @ 23.98 fps (1442 frames) encoded frames: 1442/1442 (100.0%), 45.00 fps, eta 0:00:00 encoded 1442 frames, 44.91 fps, 3905.08 kb/s ............................................... Now Starting Run 4: Pass 2 of 2 avis [info]: 1280x720 @ 23.98 fps (1442 frames) mp4 [info]: initial delay 1001 (scale 24000) 00 encoded 1442 frames, 11.56 fps, 3942.92 kb/s E8400@3825MHz XP Pro 32 Bit 2GB 425MHZ 4-4-3-9 |
AW: x264 High Definition Encoding Benchmark [code] ---------- RUN1PASS1.LOG encoded 1442 frames, 35.38 fps, 3905.08 kb/s ---------- RUN2PASS1.LOG encoded 1442 frames, 35.03 fps, 3905.08 kb/s ---------- RUN3PASS1.LOG encoded 1442 frames, 35.53 fps, 3905.08 kb/s ---------- RUN4PASS1.LOG encoded 1442 frames, 35.40 fps, 3905.08 kb/s ---------- RUN1PASS2.LOG encoded 1442 frames, 9.01 fps, 3942.92 kb/s ---------- RUN2PASS2.LOG encoded 1442 frames, 8.99 fps, 3942.92 kb/s ---------- RUN3PASS2.LOG encoded 1442 frames, 9.02 fps, 3942.92 kb/s ---------- RUN4PASS2.LOG encoded 1442 frames, 9.00 fps, 3942.92 kb/s [/code] [B]35.53/9.02[/B] C2D E6750 @ 3,2 Ghz - Vista 32 ohne SP1 |
AW: x264 High Definition Encoding Benchmark E6700 10 * 266MHz = 2660MHz @ 9 * 370MHz = 3330MHz Speichertakt: 333MHz (667 DDR2, CL4) @ 370MHz (740 DDR2 CL4) 2*1GB MDT PC667 4-4-4-15 Board: DFI Infinity 975 X/G i975 Chipsatz Windows XP 32 [code] ---------- RUN1PASS1.LOG encoded 1442 frames, 36.93 fps, 3905.08 kb/s ---------- RUN2PASS1.LOG encoded 1442 frames, 37.00 fps, 3905.08 kb/s ---------- RUN3PASS1.LOG encoded 1442 frames, 37.11 fps, 3905.08 kb/s ---------- RUN4PASS1.LOG encoded 1442 frames, 37.18 fps, 3905.08 kb/s ---------- RUN1PASS2.LOG encoded 1442 frames, 9.41 fps, 3942.92 kb/s ---------- RUN2PASS2.LOG encoded 1442 frames, 9.40 fps, 3942.92 kb/s ---------- RUN3PASS2.LOG encoded 1442 frames, 9.41 fps, 3942.92 kb/s ---------- RUN4PASS2.LOG encoded 1442 frames, 9.39 fps, 3942.92 kb/s [/code] |
AW: x264 High Definition Encoding Benchmark Verwendetes System: Mein Notebook mit Core 2 Duo T5600 1,83 GHz, Vista 32 [quote] ---------- RUN1PASS1.LOG encoded 1442 frames, 17.79 fps, 3905.08 kb/s ---------- RUN2PASS1.LOG encoded 1442 frames, 17.32 fps, 3905.08 kb/s ---------- RUN3PASS1.LOG encoded 1442 frames, 18.86 fps, 3905.08 kb/s ---------- RUN4PASS1.LOG encoded 1442 frames, [COLOR=Red]19.08 fps[/COLOR], 3905.08 kb/s ---------- RUN1PASS2.LOG encoded 1442 frames, 4.73 fps, 3942.92 kb/s ---------- RUN2PASS2.LOG encoded 1442 frames, [COLOR=Red]5.02 fps[/COLOR], 3942.92 kb/s ---------- RUN3PASS2.LOG encoded 1442 frames, 4.97 fps, 3942.92 kb/s ---------- RUN4PASS2.LOG encoded 1442 frames, 4.90 fps, 3942.92 kb/s [/quote] |
AW: x264 High Definition Encoding Benchmark E6700 10 * 266MHz = 2660MHz @ 9 * 380MHz = 3420MHz Speichertakt: 333MHz (667 DDR2, CL4) @ 380MHz (760 DDR2 CL4) 2*1GB MDT PC667 4-4-4-15 Board: DFI Infinity 975 X/G i975 Chipsatz Windows XP 32 [code] ---------- RUN1PASS1.LOG encoded 1442 frames, 37.67 fps, 3905.08 kb/s ---------- RUN2PASS1.LOG encoded 1442 frames, 38.06 fps, 3905.08 kb/s ---------- RUN3PASS1.LOG encoded 1442 frames, 38.06 fps, 3905.08 kb/s ---------- RUN4PASS1.LOG encoded 1442 frames, 38.14 fps, 3905.08 kb/s ---------- RUN1PASS2.LOG encoded 1442 frames, 9.68 fps, 3942.92 kb/s ---------- RUN2PASS2.LOG encoded 1442 frames, 9.66 fps, 3942.92 kb/s ---------- RUN3PASS2.LOG encoded 1442 frames, 9.67 fps, 3942.92 kb/s ---------- RUN4PASS2.LOG encoded 1442 frames, 9.68 fps, 3942.92 kb/s [/code] |
AW: x264 High Definition Encoding Benchmark ---------- RUN4PASS1.LOG encoded 1442 frames, 64.96 fps, 3905.42 kb/s ---------- RUN4PASS2.LOG encoded 1442 frames, 15.97 fps, 3952.85 kb/s Phenom 9850 BE @ 3,0 GHz, Vista 32 |
AW: x264 High Definition Encoding Benchmark Wäre wirklich mal daran interessiert, wie sich die c2d mobiles gegen die turion x2 mobile schlagen? Hat vielleicht einer ein solches notebook? Wäre nett, wenn er das mal benchen könnte. ;) |
AW: x264 High Definition Encoding Benchmark ---------- RUN1PASS1.LOG encoded 1442 frames, 45.37 fps, 3905.08 kb/s ---------- RUN2PASS1.LOG encoded 1442 frames, 45.76 fps, 3905.08 kb/s ---------- RUN3PASS1.LOG encoded 1442 frames, 45.66 fps, 3905.08 kb/s ---------- RUN4PASS1.LOG encoded 1442 frames, 45.71 fps, 3905.08 kb/s ---------- RUN1PASS2.LOG encoded 1442 frames, 11.97 fps, 3942.92 kb/s ---------- RUN2PASS2.LOG encoded 1442 frames, 11.97 fps, 3942.92 kb/s ---------- RUN3PASS2.LOG encoded 1442 frames, 11.98 fps, 3942.92 kb/s ---------- RUN4PASS2.LOG encoded 1442 frames, 11.97 fps, 3942.92 kb/s E8400@4050MHz 450MHz FSB XP64 |
AW: x264 High Definition Encoding Benchmark Windows Vista, Q6600 @ 2,88Ghz [quote] encoded 1442 frames, 58.36 fps, 3905.01 kb/s encoded 1442 frames, 16.11 fps, 3953.15 kb/s [/quote] |
AW: x264 High Definition Encoding Benchmark Oha... 8-O Kannst du das nochmal verifizieren? Scheint mir verglichen mit dem Phenom etwas wenig. Ich checks auch nochmal nach... LG |
AW: x264 High Definition Encoding Benchmark Hallo! Beide URLs mit dem Benchmark-Programm scheinen sind leider offline. Gibs das Tool irgendwo anders? |
AW: x264 High Definition Encoding Benchmark Fixed. LG |
AW: x264 High Definition Encoding Benchmark dr_Cox, der Link geht bei mir irgendwie auch nicht... Ich habe mal die neue version genommen unter Win 7 RC 64bit... [code] Results for x264.exe v0.58.747 encoded 1442 frames, 35.54 fps, 3905.08 kb/s encoded 1442 frames, 35.70 fps, 3905.08 kb/s encoded 1442 frames, 35.39 fps, 3905.08 kb/s encoded 1442 frames, 35.72 fps, 3905.08 kb/s encoded 1442 frames, 9.00 fps, 3942.92 kb/s encoded 1442 frames, 8.98 fps, 3942.92 kb/s encoded 1442 frames, 8.96 fps, 3942.92 kb/s encoded 1442 frames, 8.99 fps, 3942.92 kb/s Results for x264.exe v0.59.819M encoded 1442 frames, 39.49 fps, 3889.96 kb/s encoded 1442 frames, 39.23 fps, 3889.96 kb/s encoded 1442 frames, 39.40 fps, 3889.96 kb/s encoded 1442 frames, 39.55 fps, 3889.96 kb/s encoded 1442 frames, 10.01 fps, 3953.35 kb/s encoded 1442 frames, 9.96 fps, 3953.35 kb/s encoded 1442 frames, 10.04 fps, 3953.35 kb/s encoded 1442 frames, 9.99 fps, 3953.35 kb/s[/code] gebencht mit Intel Core 2 Duo E6750 @ 3,2 GHz Dice |
AW: x264 High Definition Encoding Benchmark Der Link stimmt zwar, aber wie es aussieht wird man geblockt, wenn man nicht von ihrer Seite kommt. |
AW: x264 High Definition Encoding Benchmark Sorry, habs nochmal gefixed ^^ Sollte jetzt auf jeden Fall funktionieren. Btw: ich werde nur noch die v0.59 Ergebnisse in die Liste aufnehmen. Wird natürlich gekennzeichnet. Durch die Verlinkung eurer Beiträge kann man ja die Details einsehen, wenn ihr die Ergebnisse beider Versionen postet :) LG |
AW: x264 High Definition Encoding Benchmark geht bei immer noch nicht... habs da her :[URL]http://www.techarp.com/showarticle.aspx?artno=520[/URL] mfg roe ps. gleich ma benchen ;) pps.: q9450@3504.4 MHz (8.0 x 438.0 MHz) Results for x264.exe v0.58.747 p1:encoded 1442 frames, 70.94 fps, 3905.42 kb/s p2:encoded 1442 frames, 20.27 fps, 3952.85 kb/s Results for x264.exe v0.59.819M p1:encoded 1442 frames, 75.64 fps, 3887.68 kb/s p2:encoded 1442 frames, 22.80 fps, 3962.79 kb/s win xp,steht auch unter mein system ;) mfg roe |
| Alle Zeitangaben in WEZ +1. Es ist jetzt 11:12 Uhr. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.10 (Deutsch)
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
SEO by vBSEO 3.5.2 ©2010, Crawlability, Inc.