Hab mal bisschen auf
StorageReview (Raffnix´ Tip) rumgelesen und folgendes gefunden (es geht um Performance eines Raid-0-Systems):
Zitat:
...A notable exception arises within the SR Bootup DriveMark 2002. This particular test features higher-than-normal queue depths for a single-user machine, reflecting optimizations that Microsoft has made to the Windows XP bootup process. This high load allows an array's two or more independent actuators to service queued requests and improves overall performance. Further, XP tracks the order of requests during the boot process and does its best to reorder data found on a drive to facilitate sequential reads as a system starts up. Since the Bootup DriveMark 2002 trace was captured from a system that had been restarted and defragmented many times, this individual test reflects the transfer rate advantage that one achieves through RAID 0. Therefore, if the primary purpose of one's machine is to start Windows XP, RAID 0 offers a noteable decrease in boot time. That said, Windows XP boots up fairly quickly on most modern systems, so one wonders how many reboots it will take to compensate you for the time spend installing and configuring your RAID 0 array.
...
|
@Raffnix: Hattest also recht, der Windows-Start scheint dadurch wirklich beschleunigt zu werden.