Zurück   Computer Hardware Forum - TweakPC > Hardware > CPUs und Mainboards allgemein

LinkBack Themen-Optionen Ansicht
Alt 02.01.2019, 03:48   #1 (permalink)

Registriert seit: 31.12.2018
Beiträge: 0

emmamillathompson befindet sich auf einem aufstrebenden Ast

Standard Building My First Gaming PC

Maximum power transfer

Optimum load resistance of electricity generating resources can be determined by calculating for the most energy transfer curve. During these calculations, greatest efficacy ratios for electricity resources can be achieved

Suppose you are using an electric or digital generator also that it occurs to supply a one-ohm source impedance and can be outputting a one-volt signal. What's your"greatest" load immunity?


Since Fig. 1 reveals youpersonally, there's no"best" alternative. Only compromises that rely entirely on just what it is that you are attempting to perform.

If making your load immunity fairly high, you are going to receive high efficacy and decent regulation. However, you'll be not able to acquire the most potential power from the generator. Your AC energy utility is a good instance of where generator impedance is created as low as you possibly can minimiZe all probable losses.

If making your load resistance equivalent to your source immunity, you need to extract the most potential power from the generator. However, the efficacy is going to be a mere fifty per cent along with your law will probably be poor.

Video and RF transmission lines are significant circuits where you wish to exactly match the load into the origin. Besides delivering maximum energy, you will also minimize reflections and standing waves.

You also have the option of utilizing an extremely low load resistance. That will provide you dreadful efficiency and horrible regulation. Additionally, it will deliver just a very small fraction of the feasible generator electricity. However there are not many lower-level applications where you would like your generator to appear and behave like a current source.

Those unconventional software sometimes justify the very low energy and poor efficacy.

Notice what this maximum energy transfer curve is telling us: You are able to deliver the maximum power to some loa< by projecting half the generated power away on your own source!

The maximum energy transfer curve is astonishingly wide. Double or halve your load and also the power which gets delivered drops by just about twelve per cent or so. Therefore, an specific match may not be that significant for optimum energy transfer. A precise match only might be required for different reasons: such as to get rid of standing waves and reflections.

If you're likely to create a mis-match, then it usually pays to do this on the high side. That way overall efficacy will probably be better, even when delivered electricity drops a bit.

Let us look at a few examples of the way the poor source-to-load mismatch can seriously impair efficacy. In Fig. two, let us have a piezo striker and determine what we can get from it. We'll also disable the spark gap to stop their breakdown.

RELATED ARTICLE: <Link entfernt>

Utilize a 10-megohm load, fitting source to load. This is in compliance with the P [E.sub2]/R formulation.

That is more than half a watt, thus we ought to have the ability to light a lamp onto it? Wong. Since Fig. 2-b shows usa flashlight bulb provides a resistance of about 10 ohms. Using a 10-ohm load along with a 10-megohm origin, you are able to deliver just 256 nano watts!

Efficiency is basically zero. Ergo, no mild.

Substituting a neon lamp to get a flashlight bulb might help bunches. A 1000:1 works ratio provides you a 1,000,000:1 impedance ratio. Your bulb currently"seems" just like a 10-megohm load into the origin. And you ought to get almost the complete maximum energy when calculating the lamp.

But poor ones (particularly with high-value sources forcing low-value heaps ) will seriously impair circuit efficacy.

Several columns we discovered several excellent reasons why some power generation hacks were likely to wind up a terrible scene. A number of you helpline callers pointed out that there's an even more basic gotcha.

Most electricity generators are E-field machines or H-field machines. An H-field machine employs a shifting magnetic field to induce current to a conductor. An E-field machine may utilize a changing electric field to cause a voltage across an insulator.

All of E-field machines are inherently high-impedance apparatus. The energy density of known E-field machines is very low. E-field machiens often run at the ineffective extreme left of their highest power transfer curve of Fig. 1. That's exactly where you do not wish to be.

The present state of this art in the materials science and high-vacuum techniques just won't enable the building of any cheap, high-power E-Field machine.

There never was any E-field machine produced commercial"nickel-per-kilowatt-hour" AC power.

And while some piezoelectric generator is always a E-Field machine, it's onlt that a"fair to middlin" one in its best. Signal...

Maximums and minimums

There are lots of fairly obvious methods you could confirm the maximum energy transfer curve of Fig. 1 Being lazy, I told the amazingly superb general-purpose PostScript computer language to plot it to me personally. The brief and easy Fig. 1 code seems in HACK65.PS in my GEnie PSRT RoundTable. As we've seen previously, PostScript has become the greatest hacker's language.

Or, you might enter the laboratory and use a wattmeter and variable loading resistor. That should provide you the exact same curve, again using its highest possible value matching your origin.

Let us try using some mathematics instead. Therehs this nasty rumor going around that electric circuits follow mathematics rules and which you're able to predict what they'll do by simply doing the inherent math.

In Fig. 1, there's a voltage divider which attenuates a 1-volt input by...



A pc may then plot the curve for different values of R to create the most power curve.

Incidentally, this stunt of utilizing 1-volt generators using 1-ohm origin impedances is known as normalization. If you're able to ever examine somthing utilizing simple numbers rather than ones that are hard, it will often cover to achieve that. Anything which may be scaled is also normalized.

However, there's a far greater approach to locate the maxium energy transfer stage. There's a math procedure called max-min concept that easily allows you to find minimum or maximum points for almost any affordable curve. Figure 3 displays the essential secret.

1 crude way to obtain the slope of any part on a curve is to decide on a point just before and you just past the section and generate a very small triangle outside it out.

Since Fig. 3 reveals, there are just three possible states where you are able to find a zero slope on a curve.

Just discover the math term for the slope of your own curve. Set it to zero and fix it. All options are going to be a maxium, at the minimum, or even a inflection point.

Many times, it is going to be totally obvious. Otherwise, go 1 step further and discover the incline of the incline. At minimum (3-b), the speed of change of slopw will probably be favorable. And if you're currently at an inflection point, the speed of change of slope is going to be zero.

SEE ALSO: <Link entfernt>

The"right" and"precise" method to ascertain the slope for any curve is called finding the derivative, and also this entire field is known as differential calculus. You could discover a complete set of principles in virtually any jelqing calculus 101 text. A fantastic set of calulus rules also looks from the Mathematical Tables which may be found in the Handbook of Chemistry and Physics.

I have shown how you combine max-min concept to demonstrate the maximum power transfer theorem at Fig. 1. Sure , the max is just in a load impedance that matches the origin. Taking all derivatives is quite straightforward. Great old [u.sup.n] as well as buddies.

Advanced mathematics can be fantastic stuff. And quite precious, too.

Geändert von hoyy (16.01.2019 um 10:29 Uhr) Grund: Links entfernt
emmamillathompson ist offline   Mit Zitat antworten
Alt 09.01.2019, 03:28   #2 (permalink)
Extrem Tweaker
Benutzerbild von MisterSchue

Registriert seit: 14.01.2014
Beiträge: 1.810

MisterSchue ist ein sehr geschätzer MenschMisterSchue ist ein sehr geschätzer MenschMisterSchue ist ein sehr geschätzer Mensch

Standard AW: Building My First Gaming PC

Hi there,

If you don’t want to overclock your CPU you should go with the 2600X. If you want to get used to oberclocking then you better choose the 2600. both cpus are equal , AMD just guarantee a higher clock speed for the X-Version, but oc‘ed both CPUs will nearly reach the same clock speed.

Today the risk of OC is pretty small. In my opinion OC got a lot easier with the new mainboards with UEFI bios and CPUs with open (Free) clock ratios. You just have to change the clock ratio within the BIOS and you cpu clock Speed is set to what ever you want. today there are also enough safety features to shut down your CPU would and reset your BIOS instead of damaging you CPU.

Just keep in mind that you should go for a better cpu cooler if you want to pc the 2600(x). My proposal is the be quiet shadow Rock in its newest version. Or you go for a attic cooling freezer A31 it’s cheaper and has nearly the same performance - maybe there is also a newer version of its which i don’t know.
"Sei nicht Gefangener deiner Vergangenheit. Werde zum Architekten deiner Zukunft." - Robin Sharma
MisterSchue ist offline   Mit Zitat antworten

building, first, gaming

Aktive Benutzer in diesem Thema: 1 (Registrierte Benutzer: 0, Gäste: 1)

Es ist dir nicht erlaubt, neue Themen zu verfassen.
Es ist dir nicht erlaubt, auf Beiträge zu antworten.
Es ist dir nicht erlaubt, Anhänge hochzuladen.
Es ist dir nicht erlaubt, deine Beiträge zu bearbeiten.

BB-Code ist an.
Smileys sind an.
[IMG] Code ist aus.
HTML-Code ist aus.
Trackbacks are an
Pingbacks are an
Refbacks are an

Ähnliche Themen
Thema Autor Forum Antworten Letzter Beitrag
[News] PC Building Simulator jetzt bei Steam TweakPC Newsbot News 0 29.03.2018 13:53
[News] ASRock G10: Gaming-Router mit 2-in-1-Dongle und Gaming Boost jetzt verfügbar TweakPC Newsbot News 0 09.10.2015 10:21
[News] Gigabyte X99M-Gaming 5 mATX: Kompaktes Gaming-Mainboard für Sockel LGA 2011-3 TweakPC Newsbot News 0 26.11.2014 15:18
[News] Bilder der neuen MSI Gaming 3, Gaming 5, Gaming 7, Gaming 9 AC und Gaming Mini ITX Ma TweakPC Newsbot News 0 22.04.2014 15:03

Alle Zeitangaben in WEZ +1. Es ist jetzt 07:07 Uhr.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.10 (Deutsch)
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
SEO by vBSEO 3.5.2 ©2010, Crawlability, Inc.
Impressum, Datenschutz Copyright © 1999-2015 TweakPC, Alle Rechte vorbehalten, all rights reserved